Why Mohammed and Hitler Would've Been Best Buds.

'Jews are descended from pigs and apes!
No, this isn't Nazi rhetoric. This is Mohammed's.
Those sentiments are found in the Quran, and in the mouths of Muslims even to this day.

Let's look at both Islam and Nazism, and you'll see the similarities.



Why was Islam so attractive to Arabs? It established Ishmael's precedence over Isaac. The Arab race has been defined by Abraham choosing Isaac in Ishmael's stead. They felt abandoned, castoff, and rejected. That's where Mohammed enters the scene. He told them that they were superior to Jews, and to anyone else. He promised them greatness at the expense of others. Mohammed went to great lengths to dehumanize Jews, and his enemies in general. He claimed that Allah had turned Jews into apes and pigs. He massacred an entire Jewish settlement, claiming that Gabriel had appeared to him and told him to do so. That's just ONE example. The Quran itself is full of commands to kill 'infidels'(usually Jews or Christians), and to slaughter them wherever they are hiding. Sounds pretty similar to the relentless hunting of Jews practiced by the S.S.
The Quran also says that those Muslims who do not join the fight are 'hypocrites', and that they will burn in hell for not doing so.
Ironic isn't it? Christianity says you'll go to hell if you don't accept the sacrifice of Jesus, who gave His life for you. Islam threatens to send you to hell for refusing to kill infidels.
But you say, that was a long time ago! Islam is much more civilized now!
Really?
Even today, despite years of white-washing by historians to hide Islam's brutal history, the truth still slips out, usually from the mouths of Muslims themselves.
In 2005, a popular Saudi lecturer repeated the claim that "Jews are the sons of monkeys and pigs". In 2009, a prominent Egyptian political figure took it a step further(or mixed up his history) when he claimed that the pigs living today are descended from Jews, and as such, should be killed. A Syrian official made a similar statement in 2007. Most damning of all, the highest ranking cleric for the Sunni Muslims(their pope, basically) called Jews the "The enemies of Allah, descendants of apes and pigs."
Very tolerant indeed! 
Now, what about Nazism?
 The German nation wast quite possibly at its lowest point in their history. They had lost World War I, been forced to give up vast amounts of territory, military power, etc. They were under a crushing burden of debt, and faced a terrible depression. Their self-esteem as a people was at an all time low. Then Hitler came. He told them that they were the master race, that they were genetically superior, and that as such, they should rule the Earth. Everyone who wasn't Aryan would either serve them, or be killed, as was the case with Jews. He possessed an especially strong hatred for Jews.
The Nazis, like Mohammed before them, tried to dehumanize the Jews. They were considered as low as animals, and Himmler, head of the S.S, had this to say, "Antisemitism is exactly the same as delousing. Getting rid of lice is not a question of ideology. It is a matter of cleanliness." 
Even more telling, Hitler tried to make an alliance with Haj Amin Husseini, the leader of the Muslim population in the British Mandate of Palestine. Here is some of what he had to say to Husseini:

"The FŸhrer made the following declaration, requesting the Mufti to lock it deep in his heart:


1) He (the FŸhrer) would carry on the fight until the last traces of the Jewish-Communist European hegemony had been obliterated.
2) In the course of this fight, the German army would - at a time that could not yet be specified, but in any case in the clearly foreseeable future - gain the Southern exit of Caucasus.
3) As soon as this breakthrough was made, the FŸhrer would offer the Arab world his personal assurance that the hour of liberation had struck. Thereafter, Germany's only remaining objective in the region would be limited to the annihilation of the Jews living under British protection in Arab lands."

So in both Nazism and Islam before it, Jews and those who support them are compared to animals, and in both cases, they were treated like animals. The  methods, beliefs, and goals were the same, and the results were only different because Hitler had the means and the technology to kill and enslave more Jews than Mohammed and his followers ever could.

Who knows though? Hitler is dead, and the few Nazis that still remain are essentially powerless.
There's still plenty of time for Islam to catch up.

Israelis DESTROY the Gaza Flotilla Peace Myth

Israel sets the record straight in this new video. I love it when people take a stand for the truth in such a powerful fashion. They're definitely doing it here, and doing a great job of it, I might add!!

Send this video to your friends and family. They need to know the truth!!

Supporting Ron Paul & Supporting Israel are Mutually Exclusive

Yes that's what I said. The two don't go together, anymore than conservatism goes with liberalism, common sense goes with Keith Olbermann, and Hillary Clinton goes with...eh, we won't even go there. (Insert Rush Limbaugh's age joke about Hillary here)

Now you might say, come on, how bad can he be? I'll show you how bad.

For starters, he wants to cut off all aid to Israel. He also wants to entirely get out of the Middle East, even though that will leave the place in abject disarray.

He also apparently has problems with calling Hamas a terrorist organization, and he went so far as to deplore Israel's 2009 Gaza offensive and our verbal support of it.

Citing that the 3,000 rockets fired into Israeli territory were just "a few small missiles", he condemned the House resolution that expressed strong backing for Israel in its invasion of the strip. So not only does he have a problem with us helping Israel, he even opposes us saying anything derogatory about terrorists!!

In other words, he agrees with Cynthia McKinney, but I digress.

His brilliant plan for the Middle East is this:

We should abandon our ally Israel, the only stable, western democracy in the Middle East to its power-hungry Muslim neighbors, and if Paul has his way, a nuclear armed Iran. Never mind that said country's leadership has already claimed that they want to wipe Israel off the face of the Earth. That's the other part of Paul's stance that is pathetic. Not only does he oppose helping Israel in any way whatsoever, he sees no problem with Iran having nukes. His skewed logic is that if we possess nukes, so can the Iranians! If we have it, we shouldn't stop the terrorists from having them either! After all, they need them to defend themselves against us evil westerners.

Never mind that it may lead to a nuclear war that could destroy the Middle East. Never mind that thousands of Israelis and millions of Iranians may die. Never mind that Iran might decide to give those nukes to Al Queda to use on our cities. If we hide behind our borders, they'll never attack us if as long as we leave them alone and let them do what they want unopposed!

This reminds me of a poem written by a pastor in World War II. I've modified the wording just a little.

When the Nazis came for the communists,
I remained silent;
I was not a communist.
Then they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.
Then they came for the trade unionists,
I did not protest;I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Israelis,
I did not speak out;
I was not a Israeli.
When they came for me(the Americans),
there was no one left to speak out for me.

Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892–1984)

Be silent if you want. Let evil march around the world unopposed while you hide behind your borders afraid that even speaking against it might offend them. See what it gets you.

I won't be.

Iran's Election Surprise-NOT!

For those people who claim that Iran is a democracy...think again.
Now you might say, "But they have elections". While that's true, the power of the presidential office in Iran is really quite limited. The real leader of Iran is not the president, but the Supreme Leader who hold supreme(tough guess huh?) and unlimited authority. Guess who the Supreme Leader supported in this election? Ahmadinejad. Guess who won by a large margin? Ahmadinejad.

In fact, the Supreme Leader actually decides who can run for the office of president in the first place. The president is actually little more than a mouthpiece who regurgitates what is given to to him by the Supreme Leader. Kinda like the main-stream media with Obama.

The good news is that there is a large number of Iranians who are tired of the extremist views of their radical leaders and who yearn for a freedom like that being experienced in Iraq and in a lesser sense Afghanistan. Whether they'll be able to overthrow the oppression anytime soon remains to be seen.

One thing is for sure though, Iran is not a democracy. It is instead a totalitarian regime controlled by a group of Islamic extremists determined to at whatever cost complete their goal-the destruction of Israel, and in a greater sense, the Western world as we know it.


God bless.
Remember to pray!
Links
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran
http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/iran_election_Ahmadinejad/2009/06/13/224802.html